On
November 18, 2012, two severely emaciated American Pit Bull Terriers were
surrendered to Detroit
Bully Corps. Angel died of
starvation, and Shiner is expected to make a complete recovery.
Their 18-year-old
owner, Lisa Marie Precourt, pleaded guilty to two counts of animal cruelty
charges on January 2 after waiving her right to trial and right to counsel. She faces a maximum sentence of one year and
93 days in jail, plus fines and community service if she is convicted. It is expected that she will be sentenced to
probation, pay restitution, and be barred from owning pets.
One
of two articles about the case states:
[...]
Michigan has some of the toughest animal abuse laws in the country, but getting
cities to enforce them on the local level has been a challenge.
This
problem is not unique to Michigan, no matter how good (or bad) the laws
are. What it comes down to is cities not
pursuing justice. I've seen many cases
where the laws allow for a decent punishment and yet the judge hands out a soft
slap on the wrist. I've also seen many
cases where plea deals resulted in punishment far less than the defendant could
– and should – have received. Thankfully
this is not always the case – some judges do give the max, sometimes even
stating they wish they could give them a harsher punishment. But …
What is
the point of having these laws and their associated punishments when District
Attorneys and judges don't or won't give the max? What kind of statement do the more lenient
punishments make?
Yes, each
and every case is unique, and sometimes there are facts/circumstances that need
to be taken into consideration. Precourt’s
case is one of those times. At age 18,
she is living on her own, going to school, and working two jobs. She now admits that she never should have had
the dogs in the first place. Only time
will tell if she is being sincere, or if she’s blowing smoke. I truly hope it’s the former.
Precourt’s
case aside, we have a serious problem with the justice system and the sentences
handed down in cases of animal abuse, cruelty and/or neglect. In some states, the problem lies with the laws
themselves – either the penalties are too lenient, or laws don’t even exist in
the first place. It’s hard to sentence
offenders to punishment when either a law and/or an appropriate penalty do not
exist.
In states
with appropriate laws and penalties, it’s the justice system at fault. District Attorneys cut plea deals. Judges give sentences so lenient that it’s
nothing more than a joke. The taxpayers
foot the bill for a case (investigation + trial (plus often the cost of incarceration
of the offender)) that results in what amounts to a waste of time and money.
The
bottom line: State
legislatures need to put tough laws with tough penalties into place. Cities need to pursue true justice. Taxpayers need to let their elected officials
know this is what they want – and be prepared to act (e.g. vote them out of
office) when they don’t do it.
Come on
everyone, grow a pair and speak for the animals.
Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, I will remove your post. Keep it civil, folks!
Your comment may need to be approved before it will appear on the site.
Thanks!